Kim Clijsters vs Anabel Medina Garrigues Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
K. Clijsters vs A. Medina Garrigues

Kim Clijsters

BEL

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.74m

Height

1.69m

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

$13.0M

Career Money

$1.9M

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Anabel Medina Garrigues

ESP

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.74m

Height

1.69m

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

$13.0M

Career Money

$1.9M

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Head-To-Head: Clijsters 1 - 0 Garrigues

They have played 2 sets in total, with Kim Clijsters winning 2 and Anabel Medina Garrigues winning 0. The last match between Kim Clijsters and Anabel Medina Garrigues was at the French Open - Paris, 03-06-2006, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Kim Clijsters getting the victory 6-3 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Clijsters	1
Garrigues	0

Last H2H Matches:

(R3) French Open - Paris(06-03-06)

Stats

Kim Clijsters

Anabel Medina Garrigues

K. Clijsters vs A. M. Garrigues H2H Profile

K. Clijsters	Stats	A. M. Garrigues
$12,982,120	Career Prize Money	$1,945,406
79.38% (485-126)	Career Total W/L	55.40% (400-322)
1	Clay	0
41	Titles	14
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

K. Clijsters vs A. M. Garrigues Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kim Clijsters has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Anabel Medina Garrigues has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kim Clijsters, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Anabel Medina Garrigues has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Kim Clijsters has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Anabel Medina Garrigues has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Kim Clijsters has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Anabel Medina Garrigues winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Kim Clijsters has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 82% (W/L 86/ 19), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 75% (W/L 70/ 23). Anabel Medina Garrigues has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 220/ 119), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 17/ 22).
Player level: In the last year, Kim Clijsters has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Anabel Medina Garrigues has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kim Clijsters winning 1 times and Anabel Medina Garrigues being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kim Clijsters winning 2 and Anabel Medina Garrigues winning 0. The last match between Kim Clijsters and Anabel Medina Garrigues was at the French Open - Paris, 03-06-2006, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Kim Clijsters getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kim Clijsters has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Anabel Medina Garrigues has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kim Clijsters has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Anabel Medina Garrigues has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Kim Clijsters has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Anabel Medina Garrigues has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Kim Clijsters vs Anabel Medina Garrigues Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

K. Clijsters vs A. M. Garrigues H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

K. Clijsters	Stats	A. M. Garrigues
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	7
0	Aces (Total)	1
3	Total Double Faults	0
0:0:0	Avg. Match Time	0:0:0
61% (38/62)	1st Serve %	73% (45/62)
58% (22/38)	1st Serve Win %	42% (19/45)
46% (11/24)	2nd Serve Win %	53% (9/17)
55% (6/11)	Break Pts Won %	50% (4/8)
55% (34/62)	Return Pts Won %	47% (29/62)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won → Match Won	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

K. Clijsters Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells - 04-10-2021
R1 Katerina SiniakovaK. Siniakova	L	6-1 2-6 6-2	Stats
Chicago Fall Tennis Classic - Chicago - 27-09-2021
R1 Su-Wei HsiehS. Hsieh	L	6-3 5-7 6-3	Stats
U.S. Open - New York - 31-08-2020
R1 Ekaterina AlexandrovaE. Alexandrova	L	3-6 7-5 6-1	Stats
All Lower level tournaments - 01-06-2020
R1 Sloane StephensS. Stephens	L	2-5	Stats
Abierto GNP Seguros - Monterrey - 02-03-2020
R1 Johanna KontaJ. Konta	L	6-3 7-5	Stats

View All

A. M. Garrigues Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
French Open - Paris - 26-05-2014
Q2 Tereza SmitkovaT. Smitkova	L	7-5 6-1	Stats
Q1 Jade SuvrijnJ. Suvrijn	W	6-2 5-7 6-3	Stats
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid - 05-05-2014
R1 Varvara LepchenkoV. Lepchenko	L	6-4 4-6 6-4	Stats
Portugal Open - Oeiras - 28-04-2014
Q3 Alla KudryavtsevaA. Kudryavtseva	L	6-4 3-6 6-0	Stats
Q2 Gioia BarbieriG. Barbieri	W	6-2 5-7 7-5	Stats

View All

K. Clijsters vs A. M. Garrigues Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

K. Clijsters	Stats	A. M. Garrigues
79.38% (485/126)	YTD Win/Loss	55.40% (400/322)
74.67% (1029/349)	Sets Win/Loss	55.08% (911/743)
60.86% (7497/4821)	Games Win/Loss	52.04% (7850/7235)
80.33% (245/60)	Hard Win/Loss	47.46% (131/145)
75.27% (70/23)	Clay Win/Loss	64.90% (220/119)
81.25% (117/27)	Indoor Hard W/L	47.06% (32/36)
76.81% (53/16)	Grass Win/Loss	43.59% (17/22)
0.08	Aces Per Game	0.06
501	Aces Total	441
0.15	Double Faults Per Game	0.08
882	Total Double Faults	567
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
356.8	Average Opponent Rank	476.43
64% (9181/14430)	1st Serve %	65% (17266/26633)
68% (6145/9088)	1st Serve Win %	60% (10415/17266)
49% (2531/5218)	2nd Serve Win %	47% (4413/9372)
48% (981/2025)	Break Points Won % (Total)	48% (1630/3415)
48% (6733/13946)	Return Points Win %	45% (12659/27827)
80.49% (132/32)	Slam W/L	47.37% (45/50)
75.50% (114/37)	Masters W/L	45.93% (62/73)
87.50% (21/3)	Cups W/L	43.48% (10/13)
80.15% (218/54)	Main Tour W/L	58.61% (245/173)
0% (0/0)	Challenger W/L	74.51% (38/13)
80% (479/597)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	55% (391/707)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	83% (5/6)
59% (57/96)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	52% (69/132)
62% (105/169)	Deciding Set Win %	46% (99/215)
92% (470/433)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (407/344)
7% (470/32)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	15% (407/61)
37% (141/52)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (315/52)